Hi Craig, Just to clarify, do you mean that it is not possible to them right now and should wait till next realease of Neo4j, right?
If yes, when would that be? Best, Alireza On Sunday, May 24, 2015 at 7:29:21 PM UTC+2, Craig Taverner wrote: > > Hi Alireza, > > Use cases 2, 3 and 4 are covered by the current plans and should be > available in the first release, as long as the points coordinates are in > wgs-84. Use case 1 will not be supported in the first release, as polygons > will not be possible to store or index initially. This, as well as other > coordinate systems are being considered for later releases. > > Of course, these plans could change. > > One thing about point 4. It be supported indirectly through the use of a > distance search (use case 2) combined with an order by and limit. > > Regards, Craig > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Alireza Rezaei Mahdiraji < > alire...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Hi Craig, >> >> Some of use cases are as follows: >> >> 1- Given a set of nodes with polygon geometry, find in which polygon a >> given point coordinates is located in >> >> 2- Given a set of nodes with geometry type point, find all nodes which >> thier distance to a given point >> coordinate is less than a given radius r >> >> 3- Given a set of nodes with geometry type point, which are located in a >> bounding box, >> >> 4- Given a set of nodes with geometry type point, find k nodes closest >> to a given point geometry (knn) >> >> Thanks, >> Best, >> Alireza >> >> On Sunday, May 24, 2015 at 2:20:23 PM UTC+2, Craig Taverner wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alireza, >>> >>> Yes and no. Yes, there has been progress within Neo4j, but no there is >>> nothing public to show for it yet, and it is not yet in the schedule for >>> releases. I'm hoping it is not too far off, but cannot commit to anything >>> specific yet. Once we have something more concrete to share, we'll do so. >>> >>> If you have some specific use cases you'd like to discuss, feel free to >>> contact me and we can discuss how they align with the current plans. >>> >>> Regards, Craig >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Alireza Rezaei Mahdiraji < >>> alire...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Craig, >>>> >>>> I am wondering if there is any new development regarding cypher >>>> supporting spatial queries. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alireza >>>> >>>> On Friday, October 17, 2014 at 3:02:22 PM UTC+2, Craig Taverner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Alireza, >>>>> >>>>> Right now there is only one option, the IndexProvider implementation, >>>>> which allows you to view the spatial index as an index in cypher, and >>>>> access it using the 'START n=node:A(B)' syntax, where 'A' is your index >>>>> name and 'B' contains your query. This only allows a limited set of >>>>> possible queries. >>>>> >>>>> Interestingly one of the best descriptions of this support was given >>>>> by Jim Biard in Stack Overflow at >>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24548819/neo4j-spatial-contain-search. >>>>> I welcome to you read through that. >>>>> >>>>> Our own plans to add spatial functionality to Cypher will be quite >>>>> different, based more on the newer 'Schema Index' approach in 2.x, and >>>>> allowing spatial functions in the cypher predicates themselves (in the >>>>> WHERE clauses). This should be more intuitive, but ill not be available >>>>> for >>>>> some time. This support will be part of an official neo4j release and as >>>>> such have documentation included in the normal neo4j documentation. >>>>> >>>>> The documentation for the older spatial library is a bit scattered >>>>> unfortunately. And I think Jim's answer looked like a particularly >>>>> comprehensive answer to me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Craig >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Alireza Rezaei Mahdiraji < >>>>> alire...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to know how much of spatial neo4j queries are >>>>>> expressible using Cypher? >>>>>> Is there any documentation of this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Alireza >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
