Hello,
Any update on my queries? 
Thanks in advance.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:19:51 PM UTC-7, VineetP wrote:
>
> Thanks Michael. 
> We are experimenting the Neo4j Community Edition 2.3.1 with 1 write thread 
> and multiple read-only threads. We have just one LOAD CSV session regularly 
> writing into Neo4j and multiple concurrent sessions reading Neo4j data. We 
> also have more then 4 cores on the server where Community Edition is 
> deployed. We do not notice any performance impact with more than 4 cores.
> Q1: Given our use-case, is there a limit on cores that can be used on 
> Community Edition before we can expect to see a performance degrade?
> Q2: Given our use-case, is there a legal limit on cores that can be used 
> on Community Edition?
> Q3: Can we expect a performance improvement if we simply migrate to Neo4j 
> Community v3.0?
>
> rgds, 
>
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 10:17:08 PM UTC-7, Michael Hunger wrote:
>>
>> The enterprise edition has a lock manager and some other infrastructure 
>> that scales linearly across cores. Community levels off more after 4 cores. 
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>> Am 16.06.2016 um 05:17 schrieb Santiago Videla <santiag...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Thanks Michael. I also thought about disk performance after I sent the 
>> email but is good to have a confirmation that is unrelated to 
>> community/enterprise edition. Still, apart from the import tool, I will 
>> appreciate if you could clarify me what does it mean that the community 
>> edition "scales up to 4 cores"? Having more than 4 cores just doesn't help 
>> to the community edition or it could actually yield a worse performance? 
>> What about available memory? more is always expected to be better?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:51 PM, 'Michael Hunger' via Neo4j <
>> ne...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You can provide the number of processors to the import tool.
>>>
>>> I presume it's mostly your disk performance.
>>>
>>> The import tool is unrelated to the enterprise core scalability.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Santiago Videla <santiag...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm using Neo 3.0.2 community edition and running the import tool I 
>>>> just found that on a machine with 4 cores and 32GB of RAM the import is 
>>>> actually ~2x faster than on another (virtual) machine with 38 cores and 
>>>> ~60GB of RAM.
>>>>
>>>> With 4 cores and 32GB:
>>>>
>>>> Available memory:
>>>>   Free machine memory: 16.88 GB
>>>>   Max heap memory : 6.97 GB
>>>> ...
>>>> ...
>>>> IMPORT DONE in 1m 32s 624ms. Imported:
>>>>   4135534 nodes
>>>>   43160516 relationships
>>>>   51504726 properties
>>>>
>>>> With 38 cores and ~60 GB
>>>>
>>>> Available memory:
>>>>   Free machine memory: 24.08 GB
>>>>   Max heap memory : 13.14 GB
>>>> ...
>>>> ...
>>>> IMPORT DONE in 2m 45s 299ms. Imported:
>>>>   4135534 nodes
>>>>   43160516 relationships
>>>>   51504726 properties
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this the expected behavior? I found in [1] that the community 
>>>> edition scales up to 4 cores (it says for version 2.3 but I assume the 
>>>> same 
>>>> holds for 3.0) but with more cores I'd expected at least a similar 
>>>> performance, not 2x slower.
>>>>
>>>> Should I use a machine with maximum 4 cores? Or can I configure Neo4j 
>>>> somehow to avoid such a decrease in performance? Also, is there any 
>>>> constraint about available memory and how the community edition scales or 
>>>> more memory should lead to better performance?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://neo4j.com/blog/graphs-to-production-at-scale/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Santiago Videla
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/svidela
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Neo4j" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Neo4j" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Santiago Videla
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/svidela
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Neo4j" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to