Thank you for the answer! I realise I need better probes for my scope to make the measurement you did in the second scope picture, I only have standard probes that aren't rated for those pulse voltages. Where did you hook up the probe to show that trace?
/Martin On Monday, 9 November 2015 01:27:22 UTC+1, taylorjpt wrote: > > 3 would work just fine at 600x3=1800V vs 800x2=1600. I will switch to the > 1KV parts since I already have PWBs. > > The forward bias efficiency impact will be minimal for two vs three diodes > as the forard voltage at these low currents is so much smaller than the > output voltage. > > It may even be a wash as the 600V parts are faster and energy is > dissipated as the devices switch from on to off during those Trr nano > seconds. A faster part is less energy. In either case, it's not worth the > energy to calculate it! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/1045de4a-4834-4d87-89f7-ee805970de86%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
