Thanks gregebert,
I'll have a play with the HT voltage and report back.

Craig

On Friday, 27 October 2023 at 16:33:12 UTC+1 gregebert wrote:

> You can run nixie tubes at much higher voltages if you wish, it does no 
> harm as long as you increase the series resistor to keep the current within 
> spec. For example, my first nixie clock runs the B5092 tubes from a +340V 
> supply, and I used a larger resistor (75K I think) to get the optimal 2.2mA 
> current. Running at higher voltage gives you more design margin, but it 
> does waste more energy as heat. Generally my HV supplies run between +200 
> and +220VDC; seems like every clock I make ends-up with a different power 
> supply design. So far, I've designed and built nixie clocks with B5092, 
> B6091, B7971, IN-18, and RZ568m tubes.
>
> I would bump your supply up to +200V, and adjust the resistor to get 8mA 
> of peak current (6:1 multiplexing). That will give plenty of voltage margin 
> as the tubes age.  From the photo, 8mA looks nice. I recommend that you 
> view your tube as you vary the supply voltage to get currents between 5mA 
> and 12mA just so you can see the effect of current on brightness. You 
> should see that once the tube is lit "normally", increasing the current 
> doesn't make as much of a change visually.
>
> I dont run my tubes multiplexed for a variety of reasons.
>
> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:38:06 AM UTC-7 Craig Garnett wrote:
>
>> Thanks  gregebert
>>
>> My HT is a 12V module and is adjustable but the tube spec says 170V so I 
>> left it at that.
>> Are you saying that it's safe to increase the HT to get maybe 10mA?
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Friday, 27 October 2023 at 05:06:34 UTC+1 gregebert wrote:
>>
>>> My concern is that over time as the tubes age your HV supply voltage 
>>> might be too low to ensure proper ionization. If it's not adjustable, you 
>>> can boost it with a series DC supply such as a wall-wart transformer or a 
>>> small isolated DCDC converter. Anything from +12 to +24 should work fine, 
>>> and the current is pretty low (12mA).
>>>
>>> Once you get the HV supply resolved, you will be able to get more 
>>> current thru the tubes. BUT......you may want to stay with 8mA. From the 
>>> photo, the tubes glow nicely. Tube wearout is an exponential function of 
>>> current, so staying at the lower currents is better for longer lifetime. At 
>>> some point, the current could be too low and you might see cathode 
>>> poisoning, but that's reversible. My gut feeling is that 8mA of pulsed 
>>> current should be fine.
>>>
>>> So, are you using rectified AC-mains as your DC supply ? No worries, 
>>> I've done that on several clocks and it can be done safely with proper 
>>> circuit design.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 7:28:18 AM UTC-7 Craig Garnett wrote:
>>>
>>>> The ongoing project of mine is coming on nicely but I need some 
>>>> reassurance with the way I'm driving the Z570s.
>>>>
>>>> There are two banks of 6 multiplexed tubes, from what I see from the 
>>>> datasheet these should run at 2ma static or up to 12ma as a 1 in 6 
>>>> multiplex but that is using google to translate from the datasheet's 
>>>> German.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that even with a 1K anode resistor I can't quite get 8mA 
>>>> from a 170V supply.
>>>> The photo shows two tubes, the left is static at 2mA and the right is 
>>>> multiplexed at just under 8mA with a 1mS on time from a 170V supply and 1K 
>>>> anode resistor..
>>>>
>>>> Is this ok or could I do it a better way?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/3729e8f4-28c0-48f0-9fa7-0a27d604cd99n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to