On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:33 PM, David Narvaez
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Vishesh Handa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Another thing which we haven't historically been good at is working with
> > other teams - namely Dolphin which is the most user visible way of
> > interacting with Nepomuk. This seems like a good time to plan out the
> > next 6
> > months, and see where we can collaborate. With 4.10, the
> > KFileMetadataWidget
> > was communicated before, but clearly not enough.
>
> I wanted to have KGet integrated with Nepomuk2 for 4.10 but didn't
> have much time. I can certainly take on that task for 4.11.
>
> > Also, we really need to start thinking about how we can better integrate
> > with Plasma. Marco has done some amazing work in Plasma-Active. It needs
> > to
> > be reviewed, and moved to the Plasma Desktop.
> >
> > [1] http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/4.11
>
> Good to see you included NepomukShell, it means you still remember I'm
> waiting for a mock up :) I have a couple of things I want to work on
> Okular for the next months, so I can probably be assigned to the
> Okular task if that helps others concentrate on the other core tasks.

Totally forgot about the real reason I wanted to write an e-mail about
4.11: What are we going to do with the SimpleResourceModel and friends
that were not migrated to Nepomuk2 (and are apparently needed in many
other places)?

David E. Narváez
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to