On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Vishesh Handa <[email protected]> wrote: > Lets move them then? The question is where - nepomucore or nepomuk-widgets > or somewhere else?
Nepomuk Widgets, I think. > I don't like the concept of calling the model a SimpleResourceModel cause it > has nothing to do with SimpleResources. We can just call it ResourceModel? > Actually, now that I think about it, Marco has written some Nepomuk Resource > models for Plasma active as well. > > Maybe we should look into those as well. > > What do you think David? Agree, we can take these months to look around for usage of Nepomuk in other projects, see which things could be shared among those projects and try to migrate them into Nepomuk if it makes sense. David E. Narváez _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
