On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Simeon Bird <[email protected]> wrote:
> What happens if it is different? I guess the servicecontrol function > just returns the wrong thing? > well, the service won't start then. I can probably add a proper debug message. I wonder how the Akonadi people deal with this. > > >> > Any comments on renaming nepomukserver? > >> > >> How about "nepomukmanager"? > > > > > > I meant, should we rename it at all? Or let it be called nepomukserver. > > I would say yes: the cost seems essentially zero, and as you say, it > isn't a server, so the name is misleading. > But it's your call > Lets see if anyone else has an opinion. I'm worried that everyone might already be used to calling the nepomuksever and I'll be breaking some stuff. Though people should be using nepomukctl now. > > Simeon > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
