Check if anyone stars the server manually like I think Akonadi did or
maybe they still do...
On 03/21/2013 04:33 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Simeon Bird <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What happens if it is different? I guess the servicecontrol function
just returns the wrong thing?
well, the service won't start then. I can probably add a proper debug
message.
I wonder how the Akonadi people deal with this.
>> > Any comments on renaming nepomukserver?
>>
>> How about "nepomukmanager"?
>
>
> I meant, should we rename it at all? Or let it be called
nepomukserver.
I would say yes: the cost seems essentially zero, and as you say, it
isn't a server, so the name is misleading.
But it's your call
Lets see if anyone else has an opinion. I'm worried that everyone might
already be used to calling the nepomuksever and I'll be breaking some
stuff. Though people should be using nepomukctl now.
Simeon
--
Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
