AHA -- I should have been a bit more specific - sorry.  I did some tests
side by side to make sure -- even got it to identify a crashing problem
with Oracle Discoverer (funny how a vulnerability program helps find
crashing problems...)

Anyway, I had some "newbie" security types running 2.0.7 on RedHat 7.2
(actually AS 2.1, but same versions) and I was running mine on 9.0 and
results were roughly the same (new plugins that I had and they had not
updated showed some vulnerabilities they did not.) 

I really did not do anything in the way of tweaking.  Now one thing that
could be of importance -- I was running 8.2 with Ximian enhancements XD2
to be exact. I upgraded that with a vanilla SuSE 9.0 and of course lost
my XD2 :(  -- but the rest of the upgrade went along just fine.

I run Mandrake 9.2, SuSE 9.0, RedHat Enterprise 3.0 and Gentoo 1.2 on my
laptop (with a partition for Windoze even) and do this for testing
purposes.  I have run the same scans from all and more or less, the
results are identical (sometimes I forgot to update plugins).

Now, could it have something to do with Ximian updates?  Hmm.. Not sure.
I guess it is time to do some more testing since I have a strict vanilla
SuSE 9.0 desktop handy -- have not tried that one.

I will let you know.

Kat


On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 10:12, Klun, Jim wrote:
> BTW - its NOT that nessus doesn't work for us with 9.0 - its just not
> returning 
> the same results that an 8.0 instance does. Both fresh installs with
> installer.sh used 
> to build nessus 2.0.9. 
> 
> I assume you are satisfied that your SUSE 9.0 install is returning nessus
> results consistent 
> with your earlier OS's? 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Klun, Jim
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 9:23 AM
> To: 'histar2'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: SUSE 9.0 problem
> 
> 
> Thanks - I did fall back to a 3.0 version of nmap with same results. 
> 
> Since I have a known working example ( yours ) I'll continue to 
> assume it's just a local problem on our end. 
> 
> I'd also just assume I was making an error if it were not for the fact 2
> other folks 
> who did separate installs in our group report same problems.  
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of histar2
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 9:04 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: SUSE 9.0 problem
> 
> 
> Hmm, this is strange. Installed 9.0 two weeks ago, and built 2.0.9 on it
> with no problems... running nmap 3.30 with it as well...
> 
> Kat
> 
> On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 02:31, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Klun, Jim wrote:
> > 
> > > 3.30 is what is coming with SUSE 9.0
> > > I tried 3.48 with same results. 
> > > 
> > > Is anyone out there using SUSE 9.0 with nessus? 
> > 
> > Use the nmap version you use with the other SuSE version. 3.48 is TOO 
> > modern for sure.
> > 
> > Hugo.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nessus mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
> _______________________________________________
> Nessus mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to