Hi- Thanks for the response, please see below...
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 04:28, Yeomans, Andrew wrote: > On 22 January 2004 at 03:49, Kevin Johnson wrote: > > >I believe this opens up the legal liability issue. > Not really... in this case. The scan should not be unsolicited. > The scan shouldn't be, but one of the key points in any automated scan is that it will not purposefully change something. > >Who gives permission for you to remove anything? > The same person who gave you permission to run the scan. > I don't know about you, but every agreement I have had specifically states I will not change things automatically. If something crashes or breaks inadvertantly, I am covered. This plugin does it on purpose and I believe that is the key difference. > Andrew Yeomans > > Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
