On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > On 17/10/2013 00:21, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Dmitry, >> >> I think you are correct: that slipped by both me and the reviewers. I have >> reopened the issue and posted an amendment to the original webrev here: >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8010371/webrev.4-amendment/ >> > I've restored the bug fields and I assume you'll create a new bug for the > follow-up. Sorry this was missed in the original review (probably because it > went through so many iterations). > > -Alan.
Yes I will create a new one, thanks. Brian
