On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2017, at 22:03, David Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> You mention general-purpose concepts such as ByteBufferReference and
> ByteBufferPool. Note that these are tiny implementation classes (150 lines
> in total) and not exposed in the API.
>
>
> Yes they are, currently - at least ByteBufferReference is at the heart of
> it:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/6dcbdc9f99fc/src/jdk.incubator.httpclient/share/classes/jdk/incubator/http/AsyncConnection.java#l61
>
>
> I see my error, this is a non-public interface.  Nonetheless, I'm not
> sure that it's really safe to say that this is ready.  Has there been
> _any_ external feedback on this API?
>
>
> [ You can probably ignore my previous email, I sent it before receiving your
> reply. The confusion seems to have been resolved now. ]
>
> Yes, there has been external feedback on the API. I’ll dig it up, I need to
> trawl the net-dev archives and JIRA issues.
>
> For your, and others, reference, here is a snapshot of the latest API, built
> from the ‘http-client-branch’ of the sandbox:
>
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/httpclient/javadoc/api/jdk/incubator/http/package-summary.html

Thanks.  If you don't mind answering one more question: is there any
possibility to intercept authentication completely?  There does not
seem to be a lot of documentation about authentication in this API, or
what happens (for example) if there is no Authenticator.

-- 
- DML

Reply via email to