On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:51:53 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <[email protected]> wrote:
> On a side note, the test could be more verbose - currently it is not clear if > the test passes because the options worked or because they were unsupported. > But that's preexisting and not much of a problem anyway. Agreed. When I tested this PR in our CI, I had to locally update `TcpKeepAliveTest.java` to make sure the options were indeed being considered. I'll open a separate JBS issue and propose a PR with these log message changes in that test. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14232#issuecomment-1645394284
