On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:19:17 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > I'm pretty solidly against modifying our static config files in place. DS> DS> I'm very solidly against modifying static config files in place!
:-) DS> The two options that I was thinking of were: DS> a) Support for configuring such entries via the persistent DS> config file. (c.f. current use of 'createUser') ugh. especially if it maintains the same requirement that the agent be stopped to run it. but I guess if it does SET requests, that's fine. That's what the new snmptls utility does. DS> b) Some mechanism for explicitly marking static config DS> entries as "overidable" (and hence saved to the DS> persistent config file - which would then take precedence DS> over the static entry) hmmm. DS> But I don't think that this is something which should be put into DS> the 5.6 line at this late stage. agreed! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
