>>>>> On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:03:06 +0200, Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> >>>>> said:
BVA> This change is safe because this function is new and its "return value" BVA> isn't used anywhere. The safety of the change is now judged by the masses. We made this policy quite a while ago because of changes that got introduced that "looked safe" to one person (probably me; ha) but turned out not to be. Even safe changes need to be reviewed as we near a final release. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
