>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:19:05 +0100, Magnus Fromreide >>>>> <ma...@lysator.liu.se> said:
MF> Yes. The patch I am thinking of adding was attached to the mail you MF> replied to, but here it is again. Whoops; sorry I missed it. I'm torn on this one. I think reducing the structure size is likely beneficial to "those small environments", but I'm not truly fond of all #ifdefs we could put into structures to make this happen. (but then, why don't I care about the code itself?) Certainly the .c part looks fine. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
