Well,  choice is a good thing, but sometimes it isn't:-) We need time to
study each options carefully...

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dave Shield <[email protected]>wrote:

> On 7 April 2011 14:06, Zimmer Hu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >                                   I'm reading source code try to finger
> out how
> > netsnmp_table_iterator_helper_handler works and why mfd works in another
> way
> > (inject_before)?
>
> I'd probably suggest that you look at using *either* the MfD framework,
> *or* the other (more directly) handler-based approaches.   I'm not
> convinced that it's sensible to try and get to grips with both of them
> at the same time.
>
> The whole ethos of the MfD framework is to handle as much as possible
> automatically, and provide a collection of tiny routines that are all that
> the
> MIB developer needs to work with.
>   I've tried to work through the internals of the MfD processing on a
> number
> of occasions, and got hopelessly confused every time.   I'm sure that
> Robert understands how everything fits together, but I personally find it
> much harder to follow.
>
> In once sense, that doesn't matter - the intention is that the MIB
> developer
> does not need to understand what's going on under the hood.   But if you're
> trying to understand things (as opposed to simply get them working), then
> you might find the iterator or table_data templates provide a simpler
> starting
> point.
>
>
> But that's just my personal opinion, and I've never claimed to be objective
> about the MfD framework.
>
> Dave
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to