On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:43 +0000, AR, Giridhar wrote:
> ...
>
> But select system call is getting timedout for ipv6 address, Due to
> this traps are not received.
> timeout is set to 5 seonds, its code looks like
I assume the following is running inside of an infinite loop, is that
correct?
> numfds = 0;
> FD_ZERO(&fdset);
> block = 0;
> tvp = &timeout;
> timerclear(tvp);
> tvp->tv_sec = 5;
> snmp_select_info(&numfds, &fdset, tvp, &block);
> count = select(numfds, &fdset, 0, 0, tvp);
If you send a trap to the program within 5 seconds of you starting it,
do you receive that? Normally I would have used code like
numfds = 0;
FD_ZERO(&fdset);
block = 1;
snmp_select_info(&numfds, &fdset, &timeout, &block);
count = select(numfds, &fdset, NULL, NULL, block ? NULL : &timeout);
since it isn't obvious from your code that you have something that
should happen after 5 seconds.
> .......
Does something of consequence happen in the ...'s?
> if (0 < count){
> snmp_read(&fdset);
> } else {
> switch(count){
> case 0:
> snmp_timeout();
> break;
> case -1:
> if (EINTR == errno)
> continue;
> trap_signal_trap_listener_shutdown();
> break;
> default:
> ntap_log(LOG_ERR, "select returned %d.", count);
> trap_signal_trap_listener_shutdown();
> }
> }
>
> Is there anything wrong with the arguments passed to snmp_select_info
> w.r.t ipv6 address?
The arguments look reasonable except that you are clamping the sleep
time to 5 seconds.
/MF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
