Yes, you are right. SNMPv2 traps I could receive with HP Openview but not SNMPv3 traps. The reason was same as stated by you......I found that the HP Openview's version which I was using for testing doesnot support SNMPv3.
Thanks Dave. Dave Shield wrote: > > > One more question. What does this *all* list of parameters include for > > 'trapsess' derivative? I have include security level and username. > > Yes - that should be enough. > > > Here are my settings in snmpd.conf file for v3: > [snip] > > trapsess -v 3 -l noAuthNoPriv -u public 192.168.1.210:9001 public > > That looks fine... > > > With these settings, I can receive the traps using apps/snmptrapd, > > .... and that show that it works properly. > > > but when I try to receive the traps in any other 3rd party SNMP > > Manager e.g. HP Openview etc. then it doesn't receive. > > That sounds like a problem with configuring the 3rd party manager, > or an incompatability between the two sides. > > If you send a v3 trap "manually" (i.e. using 'snmptrap') to the > remote manager, does it arrive safely? What about an inform? > Does a v1 or v2 trap arrive OK? > > Is the remote manager configured to know about the user "public" ? > (That shouldn't be necessary for unauthenticated traps, but it's > a possibility - see > http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial-5/commands/snmptrap-v3.html > for a discussion of the issues involved). > > What does the documentation for the remote manager say? > Is it logging anything? Can it be persuaded to? > > Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
