On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:17:34 -0800 Wes wrote: WH> Do you have at least 2 interfaces? You'd need to if your ignoring the WH> first and expect results back still.
Yes, an earlier message indicated that he did have 2 interfaces. WH> I'd have to study your changes in greater detail but since what you're WH> trying to do is a bit strange I can't say what you've done will work WH> though in theory it should if you did it right. I don't think so. I don't think the old API handles sparse tables automatically. It will handle missing columns, but not sparse tables. Dealing with jumping to the next row would have to be handled internally in the var_* routine. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
