Thanks a lot Dave. But in ChangeLog, it says:
Fixes:
- the agent should properly handle requests in the right order.
(e.g., restrict the agent to processing only one SET at a time)
Seems it is opposite to what you said.
Also the ordering of varbinds in a SET request may have some
significance because of dependency between the varbinds. Where can I
find doc regarding the simultaneously processing SET assignments?
Thanks,
Yong Chen
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:08 AM
To: Yong Chen (yongche)
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Multiple sets in one pdu
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 18:08 -0700, Yong Chen (yongche) wrote:
> I'm facing a problem with multiple sets in one pdu, basically it's
> sequence issue.
Remember that SET assignments are processed "as if simultaneously".
You cannot rely on a particular ordering of varbinds in the SET request.
This should *NOT* affect the success or failure of the assignment.
> It seems the agent does some optimization....
> This is not what I want, I want the original sequence.
Tough.
You should *NOT* rely on any particular ordering of varbinds.
Your code should be robust enough to cope with the assignments being
provided in *any* order.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
