Wes Hardaker wrote:
2) there is no assurance that the keychange SET itself will fail if it is messed up or fails for some reason and every SET after it would fail because it would be using the newer key.
Can you elaborate on this, please? Are you saying that there are circumstances under which the RESPONSE to the SET would indicate an error status 0 (zero, no error) even though the key hasn't been changed? I'm probably misreading this, so please clarify.
+Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
