On 14/03/07, Peter Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The response from both my systems is the same: > > snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.x.x > SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is > past the end of the MIB tree). > > Now here is where I would start suspecting the SNMP configuration on > the router (group permissions etc).
That definitely sounds like access control, yes, > The thing that makes me discount > this is that one of the hosts has a commercial product that is able to > snmp poll the router successfully. Using what SNMP version/community string? What *are* the access control settings on the router? > I have added cisco mibs into /usr/share/snmp/mibs/ - though my > understanding is i should get some results back even if i have no > mibs? Correct. The MIBs on the client side are purely concerned with how to best display the results. They have absolutely no effect on what information is (or isn't) returned by the agent. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
