Thanks Dave, your confirmation has helped. Slap me with a dead fish - the community string i was using had zero's not O's !!!
On 3/14/07, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14/03/07, Peter Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The response from both my systems is the same: > > > > snmpwalk -v2c -c public 192.168.x.x > > SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is > > past the end of the MIB tree). > > > > Now here is where I would start suspecting the SNMP configuration on > > the router (group permissions etc). > > That definitely sounds like access control, yes, > > > The thing that makes me discount > > this is that one of the hosts has a commercial product that is able to > > snmp poll the router successfully. > > Using what SNMP version/community string? > > > What *are* the access control settings on the router? > > > > I have added cisco mibs into /usr/share/snmp/mibs/ - though my > > understanding is i should get some results back even if i have no > > mibs? > > Correct. > The MIBs on the client side are purely concerned with how to > best display the results. They have absolutely no effect on > what information is (or isn't) returned by the agent. > > Dave > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
