Hello list,
I am working on ucd-snmp (version 4.2.6), extending a set of private company
MIBs. I have been told the foot-print of ucd-snmp is significantly lower than
that of newer 5.x.x series net-snmp - Is this true? If true, how big is the
difference, and what would it take to reduce the foot print. The target is
embedded Linux network device, so squeezing things down really is necessary.
I notice the mib2c is completely rewritten which seems a benefit (I am using
customized configuration files and 5.x.x mib2c seems easier to work with). Is
there other notable reasons to consider moving to 5.x.x?
Juliana
_________________________________________________________________
With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/photo-gallery-edit.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
