2010/1/13 Lewis Adam-VNQM87 <vnq...@motorola.com>: > Okay, thanks again. I may well speak to the -coders. It seems a shame to > have gone to the effort of creating scripts that cannot be re-run.
Bear in mind that the MfD code structure is an order of magnitude more complete (if you ask Robert) / complicated (if you ask me) than the alternative approaches. So it's probably only MfD-based MIB implementations where there's any real benefit to re-generating the code. With all the others, it's as simple (IMO) to fix any problems manually. None of the other approaches have the same concept of coder-editable vs hands-off code. (Or rather, the "hands-off" processing is typically done within various helpers, rather than being MIB-specific). As you may have gathered - I'm not a great fan of the MfD style. But that's primarily my personal prejudice, and I do try hard not to bad-mouth Robert's code in public..... Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
