On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Pushpa Thimmaiah <
pushpa.thimma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Fulko Hew and Alan for the information.
>
> So one can use 'snmptrap' and 'agentxtrap' depending on the requirement.
> Traps by snmptrap, agentxtrap are doesnot have any difference at the
> trap-receiver side. Am I correct?
>
> 1. If requirement is to
> - Send traps via snmp-agent.
> - Avoid duplicate config info
> - Send a trap to all destination IPs configured in snmpd.conf
> then go with agentxtrap.
> else 'snmptrap' can be used
>
That is correct.
But I would use the following criteria/question:
Do I need to make a fully functional application/sub-agent that provides
support
for SNMP get/set and traps that provides low overhead and fast response ?
Choose AgentX.
Do I need to provide minimal functionality, no SNMP get/set, and am willing
to have high overhead (frequent forking, program loading, etc) ?
Choose the command line tools.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
