Quoting a sun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 03:29:52PM
-0700:
> >I think both of you look at this in a very limited way. I think there
> >should be both.
>
> Exactly, I heartily agree.
>
> this is all getting really silly. i understand that there are several
> rpmed versions of netatalk out there. nobody, however, has bothered
> sending me the rpm bits for any of them. that's a hint.
There's also two dpkg'd (Debian package) versions out there as well.
They're maintained by Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; the 'stable'
version is 2.1.1, and the 'unstable' is 2.1.3, where 'stable' and
'unstable' refer to the Debian distributions, not necessarily
netatalk :-)
Interested parties can try their local debian mirror, or failing that:
ftp.debian.org:/debian/dists/stable/main/binary-i386/net/netatalk_1.4b2+asun2.1.1-2.deb
ftp.debian.org:/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/net/netatalk_1.4b2+asun2.1.3-2.deb
-Rich
--
Rich Lafferty ---------------------------------------------------------
IITS/Computing Services | "How should I know if it works? That's what
Concordia University | beta testers are for. I only coded it" -LT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------[McQ]--
