> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If one can run netatalk
> compiled for TCPwrappers without TCPwrappers installed then that's how it
> should be distributed.
Comments from the routine hosts_access(), the main tcp_wrappers routine:
* If the (daemon, client) pair is matched by an entry in the file
* /etc/hosts.allow, access is granted. Otherwise, if the (daemon,
* client) pair is matched by an entry in the file /etc/hosts.deny,
* access is denied. Otherwise, access is granted. A non-existent
* access-control file is treated as an empty file.
So, if the admin doesn't have the tcp_wrappers config files on the
machine, tcp_wrappers is effectively turned off. Voila.
:wes
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Paul R. Potts
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- RE: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth Marc Matteo
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth a sun
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Rich Lafferty
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth William P. McGonigle
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bloweth tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Michael Han
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind bl... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold win... wesley . craig
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a col... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... wesley . craig
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a... tkaczma
- Re: [netatalk-admins] a cold wind blowet... Wenchi Liao
