SuSE doesn't come installed with PAM, and i tried to install it, but i
needed so many other things to satisfy dependencies, that i got frustrated
and gave up.  i also tried to install netatalk via the .rpm, but it said it
needed PAM to install correctly.  is there a way to install with the rpm
without having PAM?  right now im starting from scratch.  netatalk isn't
installed at all, but the ports are opened in /etc/services.  i have the
.rpm and the source files...  how should i proceed?

charlie chrisman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Newman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: problems with netatalk


Does SuSE use PAM?  You made need to make a netatalk PAM file in /etc/pam.d/

My "netatalk" file looks like this:

#%PAM-1.0
auth       required     /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow use_first_pass
account    required     /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
session    required     /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so


Hope that helps.

Jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Appletalk on Linux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Charlie Chrisman
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 1999 8:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: problems with netatalk
>
>
> Im trying to get netatalk to work on my linux file server.  the server is
> running SuSE linux 6.2 with shadow password support.  I compiled netatalk
> with shadow password support and opened the ports in /etc/services file.
the
> shell the user tries to login with is in /etc/shells.  i can connect as a
> guest and have read only access to the files, but i need read/write
access.
> ive looked in all the faq's, help files and everything and can't find
> anything that helps.  can anyone give me an idea where to start?  i looked
> in the syslog and it shows the connections trying, then the last thing it
> says is 'login noauth'.  any ideas?  also the file server doesn't show up
in
> the chooser of the macs.
>
> thanks
> charlie chrisman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.iHigh.com
>

Reply via email to