At 19:07 Uhr -0800 31.05.2000, Tom Watson wrote: >One area I would be interested in is kernel support for LocalTalk I/O >boards. Is already there in 2.2. But see also my message about NBP/routing issue in atalkd. >Then I could have the Linux box "route" and (later) >supply IP addresses as well (regards to John V.). On LocalTalk? :wq! PoC
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Marcus Radich
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... S.Ecker
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Ron Chmara
- FW: netatalk in production environments....(... Luke McNeilage
- FW: netatalk in production environments....(... Luke McNeilage
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Tom Watson
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Steve Freitas
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environme... wesley . craig
- Re: netatalk in production envir... andrew morgan
- Re: netatalk in production ... wesley . craig
- Re: netatalk in production envir... Patrik Schindler
- [OT] [Re: netatalk in produ... thomas.riewe
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Steve Freitas
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Luke McNeilage
