> From: andrew morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Not to be too picky, but will they be amenable to user-contributed > patches, documentation, etc? Any details of the arrangement you can > provide would allow the netatalk community to provide feedback and ensure > we all get what we need. I'll pass on what I get. If you have input, I can pass that on as well. My primary interest is in seeing netatalk not languish while at the same time not personally serving as the gateway for changes or the release engineer. Satisfying the interests of the netatalk community is clearly critical to achieving the "not languish" goal. :wes
- FW: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Luke McNeilage
- FW: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Luke McNeilage
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Tom Watson
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Steve Freitas
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... wesley . craig
- Re: netatalk in production environme... andrew morgan
- Re: netatalk in production envir... wesley . craig
- Re: netatalk in production environme... Patrik Schindler
- [OT] [Re: netatalk in production... thomas.riewe
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Steve Freitas
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Luke McNeilage
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Chip Mefford
- Re: netatalk in production environments.... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Tom Watson
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk in production environments....(RFC) Steve Freitas
