At 1:36 am -0400 8/6/2000, Bryan Stalcup wrote:
>So what other 'bits' besides the Lancewood motherboards do you recommend?
>
>  > Concerning server speeds, we have found through extensive tests that
>  > you can build Linux/netatalk boxes which out perform ASIP, WinNT, and
>  > Win2000 by a significant margin. PCs are about getting the 'bits'
>  > (Processor, Motherboard, Ethernet etc) to work properly together. We
>  > have struck a formula with Intel Lancewood motherboards and various
>  > other parts which work very well as a Linux/netatalk server. The same
>  > hardware running WinNT or 2000 performs very well, but not as well as
>  > netatalk
>
>---
>bryan stalcup
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]

No problem.

Hardware:
-Intel Astor II Chassis
-Intel Lancewood Motherboard (440GX based, Onboard Ultra2 SCSI, Video etc)
-Intel Pentium III 600 Processor (Single only)
-Sony IDE CDROM
-IBM 7200 RPM Ultra66 Boot disk (IDE)
-IBM 10,000 RPM SCA2 Drive (SCSI to fit into the Astor II - use 
software RAID if required)
-Asante 10/100 ethernet controller (Or other 'name brand' 
Digital/Intel 2114x based card)
(Use cards which are driven by the 'tulip' kernel module. The onboard 
ethernet on the Lancewood is the only exception - seems to work fine.)
- 128MB  of RAM
- Use high quality cables (including CAT 5 patch leads and internal ribbons)

Software:
- Red Hat 6.1 (Custom install, with everything on)
- netatalk 1.4b2+asun2.1.4 - 37b
- Turn off all surplus services (httpd, named, innd, nfsd etc..)
- Close down surplus ports in /etc/inetd.conf
- Used fixed IPs, don't use DHCP or any other 'lazy admin' tools
- Turn off PAPD until it is fixed.
I don't use any other distro than RedHat, this one seems the best for 
this type of server.

When you do a '/usr/sbin/haparm -tT /dev/sda' on this machine, you 
should get 130MB/sec across the motherboard, and 30MB/sec off the 
drives.

mrad01

========================================================

"Always ask the question, never assume the answer."
                Marcus Radich 1999

========================================================

Reply via email to