I mentioned in my original post that I had installed Netatalk before. The
reason is that after getting it working nicely in 5.2 I did a clean install
of 6.1 (wanted to change the partitioning of the HD). It was a mess.
Nothing worked. I finally gave up and went back to 5.2. I hoped to get
everything working and then upgrade, in hopes that already installed stuff
would continue to work. Now I'm having this problem. I don't understand why
I have to upgrade to fix this problem. The file that is needed is there. It
was installed with 5.2. Why doesn't it work? In case it doesn't sound like
it, I _do_ appreciate your response. Thanks. Maybe I'll try upgrading to
6.2 now, since I do have a lot more things working than I ever did in 6.1.
RK
At 10:22 AM 07/31/2000 +1000, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
>I installed this same RPM. I had the same problem so I upgraded to RedHat
>6.2. It installed OK (except for having to change /etc/rc.d/init.d/atalk
>slightly) aand has been running without intervention for about one month
>now.
>
>I think this is the best choice becuase Linux changed fron using libc5 to
>libc6 and most recently developed software will require libc6 unless
>specificially compiled for libc5. So save yourself future headaches and
>upgrade to 6.2.
>
>Wilson
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard Kieran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 12:33 PM
>Subject: RH 5.2 Netatalk install
>
>
> > I'm trying to install Netatalk from an RPM on RedHat 5.2. The RPM file I'm
> > using is:
> > netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.3-7.i386.rpm. When I try to install it I get a
> > message saying it needs the file libc.so.6. I found this file in the /lib
> > directory. I tried copying it to the directory where the rpm file is, but
> > still got the same message. I have installed Netatalk on RH 5.2 before and
> > I know I didn't get this message. I may have been using version 2.1.3-6
> > instead of 2.1.3-7, but I'm not sure. Any help will be appreciated.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------
> > Richard Kieran
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
------------------------------------------
Richard Kieran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
