Those are nice. You win my respect.
james morris wrote: > most relevant: > > ls -diw02 > > -- > interesting output: (i have colour enabled for ls) > > ls -shim > ls -shox > ls -smack > ls -turps > > -- > most wordy: > > ls -futurist > ls -propaganda > ls -mashpotato > ls -signalfault > ls -inconspicuous > ls -inspirational > > -- > what do I win? > > > On 3/11/2009, "james morris" <ja...@jwm-art.net> wrote: > >> And I thought I was being clever with >> ls -hot >> >> ;-) >> >> >> On 3/11/2009, "Pall Thayer" <pallt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> How many literal ls argument combos can you come up with (if it returns >>> an "invalid option", it's disqualified). >>> >>> ls -dog >>> ls -cat >>> ls -rockandroll >>> ls -artist >>> ls -musician >>> ls -fuckit >>> >>> etc... >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
