...MANIK HAVE SERIOUS CAREER BEHIND...WHICH INCLUDE EXHIBITION IN BEST GALERIES IN BELGRADE...OUR VIDEO WAS SHOWN ALL AROUND EUROPE...AFTER ALL OF THAT WE ARE NOT INTERESTED TO MAKE EXHIBITION IN SOME SHITHOLE GALERIES...THAT'S FOR ART STUDENTS...YOU MISS POIN OF ALL OUR STORY...OF COURSE MANIK ESPECT TO HAVE EXHIBITION IN TATE OR GUGENHEIM...OR PLACE LIKE THAT...OR YOU THINK IT'S NOT FOR MANIK.../?/...MANIK...MAY...2010... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Sondheim" <sondh...@panix.com> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:47 PM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] IMPORTANT STATEMENTS CXXXXIV
> > > I wonder if this isn't the result of an absent somewhat self-sustaining > art community? In NY, there are numerous venues - it's almost impossible > to get into a museum etc. (that's "blue-chip" stuff) - but it's not > difficult to set up a show somewhere, or show at a smaller space - it's a > much broader base. This is especially true for dancer/musician/performer - > these things can be done fast and there are a lot of venues - everyone I > know here shows somewhere, including people who aren't making money from > their work. So the big deals are still there, but they're with "big" > artists who are also brokers - it's a different kind of corruption, but > it's one that's easier on bottom-feeders. A big problem is the relation > between art and design - so many young artists are concerned with making > it and the political/critical edge isn't there so much. On the other hand > earlier on, people like Vito Acconci and Dan Graham seemed ruthless here - > ambition was everything. > > - Alan > > > On Sat, 1 May 2010, manik wrote: > >> ...ART BUREAUCRACY IS EXTENSION OF CORPORATIVE *IDEA*...THEY EXISTED TO >> EXPLOIT RESOURCE WHICH ART MAKE TROUGH HER SHORT INDEPENDENT >> HISTORY/ARTIFACTS...REAL ESTATE.../ETC.../SO CALLED *AESTHETIC*AS SCIENCE >> IS >> NOTHING ELSE THAN ONE MORE PLAYGROUND FOR MARKET...ART >> BUREAUCRACY LIKE CLERKS BUY AND SELL...NOTHING MORE ...NOTHING >> LESS...*BIG* >> NAMES OF CURATORS...ARTISTS... AND ART BROKERS ARE LIKE HEAP IN SOME BIG >> STOCK MARKET...THEIR NAMES ARE EPHEMERAL...THEIR ROLE IN ART IS MOSTLY >> DISHONEST...EXAMPLE...IF YOU WANT TO MAKE SOME EXHIBITION IN MY COUNTRY >> YOU >> MUST CONTACT SOME STATE INSTITUTION...NOT SOME NET.CHARACTER LIKE MANIK >> OR >> SOMETHING...DEAL IS BETWEEN TWO SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS...MINISTRY IN SERBIA >> STEP IN DEAL WITH RECIPROCAL MINISTRY OF OTHER COUNTRY AND FLOW OF MONEY >> IS >> ESTABLISHED... INDIVIDUAL IS JUST SIGNATURE ON CHECK WHO GIVE LEGALITY TO >> THIS DREGS...FOR ARTIST LEFT SOME SMALL CHANGE AND *GLORY*... FINALLY >> *ART >> BUREAUCRACY* DECIDE WHAT'S ART AND WHO COULD BE ARTIST...ARTIST'S ARE >> COLLATERAL DAMAGE NOW ...THEY LIVE IN WORST UTOPIA EVER...IN WORLD OF >> *WESTERN POTLATCH* >> /.BATAILLE-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Bataille/...BUT WITHOUT >> IT'S >> ETHIC BASE...EXTINGUISHED AND HUMILIATE ARTIST IS HAPPY TO GIVE TO FAT >> *ART >> BUREAUCRACY*HIS BLOOD...IN RETURN THEY CAN SHIT OVER HIM AND HIS >> SURVIVAL...THAT'S LOOK TO US LIKE WORST PERVERSION...EVER...MANIK...MAY >> DAY...2010... >> >> > > > == > email archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/ > webpage http://www.alansondheim.org > music archive: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/ > == > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > __________ NOD32 4979 (20100328) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
