...born... 1991...
That makes me feel so old. Perhaps taking on your identity for a while
would make me feel young anew.

On 7/11/10, karen blissett <karen.bliss...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>You have already told us a bit about your celebrity art parents.
>>>Do you feel that you are following in their footsteps?
>
> I was born on the 3rd of May 1991 to Karen Eliot and Luther Blissett
> at exactly the same time that the first successful double head-heart
> transplant was being carried out in a hospital in London.
>
> Our parents were not interested in us. They still deny my existences.
> They are only interested in art and politics not in how we spend our
> days on the Internet.
>
>>>Why have you issued this invitation to join you now? And why by email when
>>> everyone is so busy socialising in sites like Facebook and Twitter?
>
> Because email is the heart-and-brain, the command-and-control center
> of digital identity for the masses. Because, spaces like Facebook and
> Twitter are safe and secure. Entering them is like going into a
> pastel-colored milk parlor with muzak playing in the background.
> Everyone looks the same, acts the same and constantly tells each other
> that everything is alright. They are protected and controlled by the
> interface design and rulez and regz and they can 'like' things but
> they can't 'dislike' things. They become the well-behaved product of
> the interface.
>
> We have spent the last few years squatting in online spaces like these
> and watching people change shape. Sometimes getting involved too. We
> prefer places where we can change the interface and interact more
> freely. That's why we issued the first invitation to join us to the
> Netbehaviour list. We know that people here like to get get their
> hands dirty.
>
> I am a bit worried though that we might accidently allow a hostile
> identity to join us. This could lead to effective suicide. We could be
> wiped out in one blow.
>
> You asked "why now"?
> I'm not really sure but It feels like the right time to experiment
> with openness, freedom vulnerability on a more personal level
>
> What do you think?
>
> Karen
>
> --
> Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Ruth Catlow
> <ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org> wrote:
>> Great stuff so far Karen(s) and Marc and Michael and Alan,
>>
>> It seems to me Karen that you are likely to be closer to nn than to "the
>> essential guide to mandiberg"...
>> more anarcho-cyborg than the bureaucractic-art-twonk that is the
>> over-surveyed subject of mandiberg's alter-ego; )
>>
>> I think that's something to do with that fact that you are inviting people
>> to join you by opening up your email.
>> It is not "about" being multiple.
>> It "is" being multiple.
>>
>> You have already told us a bit about your celebrity art parents.
>>
>> Do you feel that you are following in their footsteps?
>>
>> Why have you issued this invitation to join you now? And why by email when
>> everyone is so busy socialising in sites like Facebook and Twitter?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Ruth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: karen blissett <karen.bliss...@googlemail.com>
>> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
>> <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
>> <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me
>> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:37:15 +0100
>>
>> So...yes please Ruth
>>
>> perhaps the interview has already started.
>>
>> :)
>> Karen
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ruth Catlow
>> <ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Karen,
>>
>> What an intriguing idea brimming with subversive potential; )
>> I would like to join you.
>>
>> But before I "speak and act as you" I would like to "speak to you" to find
>> out more about you and why you have decided to to do this.
>>
>> How would you feel about a short interview here in the Netbehaviour list?
>>
>> very best things
>> Ruth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: karen blissett <karen.bliss...@googlemail.com>
>> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
>> <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
>> To: netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> Subject: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me
>> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:43:24 +0100
>>
>> Dear Friends.
>>
>> Please join me.
>>
>> Literally.
>>
>> I want to become more open and free, with a more distributed identity.
>>
>> So if you would like to take a break from yourself and speak and act as me
>> instead, please drop me a personal email.
>>
>> If I trust you I will send you my password and you can start expressing
>> me.
>>
>> Can't wait!
>>
>> Karen Blissett
>>
>> --
>> Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

*****************************
Pall Thayer
artist
http://www.this.is/pallit
*****************************
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to