Well Netwurker and others, I am rather offended that you dismiss my comments. As I¹ve said, don¹t implode. At this point, it¹s a bad idea.
As for the filters comment, we all discussed it you even gave instructions, but you accelerated a cultural death to the Syndicate that was unfair. You will probably respond to Simon rather than me we were around at the same time and still operate. What is that all about? Helen On 12/7/10 00:08, "mez breeze" <netwur...@gmail.com> wrote: > ...having been 1 of the celebrated "spam artists" back in the days of > Integer>NN, it was a [relatively easy] option then [as it is now] 2 set up > filters/blocks in regards 2 material list users find > objectionable/overloading. i do agree, simon, that it might b deemed arrogant > to deluge ppl with mammoth data hits: i think to associate this with the 7-11 > list outpourings we did back in the late 90's is misleading. the art lists we > "spam"/net.artists utilized knew full-well about our art practices + most > encouraged it. context, content + the mechanisms of exclusion should b > examined here as well as allusions 2 data-deluges;) > > chunks, > @netwurker
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
