In which case my own practices are probably miserable...
- Alan
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Helen Sloan wrote:
Well
Netwurker and others, I am rather offended that you dismiss my comments.
As I?ve said, don?t implode. At this point, it?s a bad idea.
As for the filters comment, we all discussed it ? you even gave
instructions, but you accelerated a cultural death to the Syndicate that was
unfair.
You will probably respond to Simon rather than me ? we were around at the
same time and still operate. What is that all about?
Helen
On 12/7/10 00:08, "mez breeze" <netwur...@gmail.com> wrote:
...having been 1 of the celebrated "spam artists" back in the
days of Integer>NN, it was a [relatively easy] option then [as
it is now] 2 set up filters/blocks in regards 2 material list
users find objectionable/overloading. i do agree, simon, that it
might b deemed arrogant to deluge ppl with mammoth data hits: i
think to associate this with the 7-11 list outpourings we did
back in the late 90's is misleading. the art lists we
"spam"/net.artists utilized knew full-well about our art
practices + most encouraged it. context, content + the
mechanisms of exclusion should b examined here as well as
allusions 2 data-deluges;)
chunks,
@netwurker
==
email archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
webpage http://www.alansondheim.org
music archive: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
