Alan, Helen, Ana and List

This info is really helpful and I will let you know how it all goes. It's a
project that I'm following collaboratively and slowly with organisations,
among them Furtherfield and MARCEL (worth looking them up
http://mmmarcel.org - they have been pursuing this since mid 1990s and I'm
sure many of you know of it - they really set the vision and precedent for
some of this as far as I can see).

What should be a simple issue of many to many shared spaces on the network
seems to be proving elusive - it's possible to obtain good sound or visuals
but not both. Clearly telematic work has been around for a while and is
being developed but there do seem to be issues with what exists.

Access Grid is still only accessible ( ;-)) if you are part of an academic
network or attached to one - that has not changed but as Alan says it's
possible to see some very interesting material from other organisations and
to make connections with them; skype as far as I know does not support
multiple connections through video and sound (only sound to date). CuSeeMe
I've heard of but have not looked into - thanks for the pointer Alan. Also
as you say, Second Life does seem to be developing some more convincing
spaces than a couple of years ago.

There are developments in industry and there seem to be a large number of
videoconferencing packages available to buy - but what they can do is
limited for artists.

Ana, regarding the social networking I thought that Google Wave was going to
do what you suggested but I've not heard about it for a while??; also
joindiaspora.com looks like it might have potential - there are probably
others who know much more than I do about this and my suggestion is
certainly not all open source.

Of course the multicasting raises many issues: access, bandwidth and
sustainability to name some big ones. And the issues also depend on the
approach of the government that is regulating the internet - in UK emphasis
on basic infrastructure and strong regulation of the net. What seems like a
simple issue starts to become a more substantial question.

My knowledge of the technical side is limited although I am learning - I am
working with a team of others who have more of a grasp of it than I do and I
know that many on this list have done much more work than I have. I'm keen
to develop the possibilities of its use though and look forward to continued
discussions even if they do take a while to emerge, at least from me...

Helen

PS Marc, congratulation on the Mphil/PhD

On 18/10/10 20:46, "Alan Sondheim" <sondh...@panix.com> wrote:

> 
> Please let us know what you come up with here? I know Foofwa has used
> Skype for teaching dance - but the video's projected. There was the old
> CuSeeMe which was really buggy, but it was many-to-many and it might have
> been updated in some dark corner of the Internet... It did work on dialup
> even. -
> 
> - Alan
> 
> 
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, helen varley jamieson wrote:
> 
>>  hi helen & alan :)
>> 
>> as i said my experience of access grid is limited; i didn't know it was
>> possible to have it on one's own laptop - how does this work if you are
>> not connected to an institution? can you set up your own conference
>> independently, &/or tune in on things that are being done from within an
>> institution?
>> 
>> the two disadvantages of skype are that (as far as i know) video
>> conferencing is still only one-to-one; & the audio quality varies
>> enormously - i can have a 2 hour conversation that sounds absolutely
>> perfect then suddenly it disintegrates into completely unintelligible
>> underwater bubble talk. occasionally i just can't get a good audio
>> connection at all. the only time i have tried to use skype in a
>> performance (other than as a back-channel), it worked perfectly until
>> the moment i was supposed to start, then it crashed, right on cue ...
>> 
>> helen - i am in exeter now, for the next couple of weeks, & i believe
>> we're meeting next monday 25th (with paula crutchlow) - looking forward
>> to it, & to talking more about this :)
>> 
>> h : )
>> 
>> On 18/10/10 4:45 PM, Helen Sloan wrote:
>>> Hi Helen and Alan
>>> 
>>> Thanks for responding.
>>> 
>>> We are trying to create spaces that can synchronise sound and visuals and
>>> allow for high resolution of sound and image. It is possible that we've got
>>> a bit obsessed with this. It does however have an impact on the dialogue we
>>> are trying to produce given the nature of the artists we are working with.
>>> Access Grid works well with some of this but not all.
>>> 
>>> However, I agree with both of you that there is little point in doing
>>> something that is beyond the reach of audiences and other contributors. It
>>> needs to be simple - we're trying to work all that out; and do something
>>> that is not already covered by broadcast ;). Hence my questions.
>>> 
>>> I've got Access Grid on my computer at work and do use it occasionally - but
>>> given what my computer (or I...) can do, skype is just as good at the
>>> moment. It is a bit different in the studio.
>>> 
>>> Alan, what was your experience of Access Grid? Helen, if you are in Exeter
>>> later in the month it would be great to talk some more - or on the list if
>>> not.
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> Helen
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 18/10/10 16:26, "Alan Sondheim"<sondh...@panix.com>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Access grid requires a couple of tables and computers; we never used a
>>>> control room at all. The quality is camera-dependent, but that's true of
>>>> any conferencing software.
>>>> 
>>>> It was fun to use; I used it all the time when I was working at WVU - both
>>>> at the university and at 'home' on a laptop or desktop. Fun to tinker with
>>>> as well.
>>>> 
>>>> - Alan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> 
>> helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst
>> he...@creative-catalyst.com
>> http://www.creative-catalyst.com
>> http://www.avatarbodycollision.org
>> http://www.upstage.org.nz
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ==
> email archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
> webpage http://www.alansondheim.org
> music archive: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
> ==
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to