One of many points today - I wonder if this conversation could be extended here to the UAE, where there is a great deal of cultural activity (but it is still a small¹town)
From: ruth catlow <ruth.cat...@furtherfield.org> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org> Date: Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 10:04 PM To: <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] An interview with Geert Lovink Thanks Annie and Randall, for offers to host and for your ideas and reflections. The idea of asking a gallery visitor to join a discussion on Netbehaviour is provoking! I look forward to hearing more from you Annie: ) Randall,I'd also like to comment on something you wrote in an earlier mail : "it¹s not clear to me that he is aware of the many museums in the US and the around the world that are employing social media and what is called ³user-generated content² in all sorts of compelling ways that invite engagement and social change. " I think that what is under discussion here is digital art or media art that prompts a more critical reflection about digital tools and technology- and considers how they influence and change mass behaviours and society and power etc. I think this goes beyond 'engagement'. This is not to dismiss the work that you describe- just to distinguish. Ruth On 01/10/15 13:42, Randall Packer wrote: > > > > Ruth, that¹s the first time I have heard you articulate the high-importance of > the relationship and intersection between the physical Furtherfield venues > with the virtual networked spaces of the list, etc. This cross-pollination > between the local and the remote seems to always be the great challenge of > networked projects and their communities, but also one of the most > interesting. The question and solutions you raise are compelling: to create a > dialogue across this divide, creating third space social engagement between > the two. How do to this with a text-based email list is an even greater > challenge, so I think having those who are on the ground in the park, or at > least actively involved in what is happening there, should be hosting > conversations on the list: reportage from the Furtherfield gallery. I wonder > also if it is possible for visitors in the gallery to participate here, though > that seems more appropriate for social media. When we created multiple > channels for NetArtizens, that presented a good distribution solution, > especially when there was cross-referencing between Twitter and NetBehaviour. > Personally, I think it is interesting to think about all the various channels > we use as a wholistic activity, because in a sense, they all seem to blend > together with a lot of the same participants, for example Marc¹s Facebook > postings with this list. You bring up some crucial networked issues in terms > of engaging virtual communities, the key question being how to bridge those > virtual communities with physical social spaces. > > > > > > > From: <netbehaviour-boun...@netbehaviour.org> on behalf of ruth catlow > Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity > Date: Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 5:21 AM > To: <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>, <bram....@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] An interview with Geert Lovink > > > > > > > > Dear Annie, > > You have thrown the cat amongst the pigeons of my mind! > > Of course! > > All the time I think - what makes Furtherfield/Netbehaviour super-special is > this link between what happens in the experiments and conversations between us > all here on the list, and in the physical places in the Furtherfield park > venues (and on tour). > > The work done by our avant-art-tech networks and communities prompts > wonderful (I find them wonderful) encounters, activities and conversations > with park users, local residents (from every country- perhaps- in the world) > and exhibition visitors (local and international). > > But I too have had a feeling of un-ease about a disconnect with the > conversations that happen here on the list. This list is one of my favourite > places, and yet I find it hard to advocate for it, to people who are not > already here. Perhaps because email has now acquired toxic associations for > many people because of the demands it places on 'immaterial labourers'. > > I have a couple of thoughts about what we might do. > > Firstly- a Netbehaviour subscriber could volunteer to host, here on the list, > any of the following people > > * artists in our upcoming show, > * a recent student placement student, > * any member of our regular (overworked) staff-team. > I would invite them to join us as our guest, to talk about their work, > contribution and experience with Furtherfield. As a host you would be > responsible for making them feel welcome here and helping them (by mailing > with them in private) to negotiate conversations if they were to get spikey: ) > > Secondly > > If there is an appetite amongst netbehaviourists for more sharing of > Furtherfield process, it would be easy (and pleasurable, and useful, and > actually quite a relief) to open up and share some of the things happening 'on > the ground'. As long as people could tolerate incompleteness (we have to take > care not invade the privacy of collaborators and partners), contradiction (I > have an unruly mind), and the occasional indefensible statement (we work it > out as we go) along the way. > > To give you a taste of what kinds of topics these might touch on let me start > with a brain dump of the possible [Netbehaviour] Subject Headers about > Furtherfield process. > > > * DAOWO preparation excitement! >> * see here http://www.furtherfield.org/artdatamoney/debate/ >> * >> * > * Reflections on attempting to maintain critical and politically astute art > processes - without being po-faced and elitist. > * > * > * Installing work by [insert the names here of every artist in Furtherfield's > upcoming exhibition The Human Face of Cryptoeconomies http://bit.ly/1VrLivJ ] > at Furtherfield Gallery. > * > * > * Calculations, tactics and strategies for dealing with Furtherfield finances >> * Talking to businesspeople (lots of odd feelings!) and how Jeremy Corbyn is >> helping >> * >> * > * Summer at the Museum of Contemporary Commodities - open participatory > process - an extreme sport. >> * pictures here >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/http_gallery/sets/72157656437894006 >> * >> * > * Why Furtherfield Commons has had no landline for 3 months >> * (How BT handed over our line to another service provider without our >> agreement and then wouldn't get it back) >> * >> * > * Preparations for an upcoming street programme 'The People's Magna Carta' at > Frequency Festival in Lincoln. > * > > * The Furtherfield website - opening up to noobs and improving diversity of > participants > * >> * 7 placement students make themselves heard (it's all a bit tricky!) >> * >> * > * Seeds of a plan for an experimental innovation lab for values based > economies >> * The Oslo Innovation Manual (apparently the role of arts, design and culture >> go unaccounted for) >> * >> * > * How blockchain is redolent with the decentralised distributed promise of the > early web > * >> * How we're not falling for the utopian promise of blockchain - but skippy >> with excitement nevertheless! >> * >> * > * What 7 placement students said about their Summers with Furtherfield > * > * > * How we are thinking about expanding outward and upward (and inward) at the > gallery/lab in the park and > * > Finally... > > Thanks to Geert (see subject header) for carrying out this in depth > experiment with the Netbehaviour subscribers; ) > and to Annie for investigating the cause of that sourness; ) > > > What do you reckon??? > Tell us, we'll do something!!! > > respect due! > Ruth > > On 30/09/15 22:11, Annie Abrahams wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> hi Randall, >> >> >> I am not necesarrily asking for more, better media, for more livelyness, I >> am not sure I want more ... >> >> I would like a content re-de-placement, more of the processes going on >> (artistic and organisational) and les about results and "look what I have >> done" I would like that there would be more slowness, more attention, more >> time for open reflexion on what has been done, less representation and for >> now i see that still more in the mailinglist than on the social media. I >> think we should reinvent reinvest mailinglists! Netbehaviour first of all. >> >> >> see you >> >> Annie >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Randall Packer <rpac...@zakros.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I¹m not sure where to set into this thread, which has become multi-threaded >>> in all sorts of interesting directions. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding Geert: without going into a complete analysis, it¹s not clear to >>> me that he is aware of the many museums in the US and the around the world >>> that are employing social media and what is called ³user-generated content² >>> in all sorts of compelling ways that invite engagement and social change. I >>> have taught courses in the Johns Hopkins University Museum Studies program >>> where the students are deeply involved with museum-based social and ³visitor >>> engagement,² to use another museum term. I believe the interview does have a >>> few absolutes that have not been thoroughly researched, although I have the >>> utmost respect for Geert and his critique of corporate-based social media: >>> it¹s just not fair to museums that are making striking progress, and of >>> course the many alternative arts organizations, maker-faires, and >>> hack-a-thons around the world that are incorporating socially-based forms of >>> art and science. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding Annie¹s concern for place: I agree, we need the means of >>> interaction that while remote, give us a more real-time, visual, media-rich >>> form of interaction and engagement. I enjoy the ease and simplicity of an >>> email list, but there are times you want to see faces, hear voices, trade >>> gestures, communicate with sound, all of which is near impossible in this >>> medium as a live experience. There is no replacing the live: we need to >>> embed the real-time into our networked interactions, which for many of us >>> here has been at the heart of our artistic work and research. We are all >>> nodes on a network, and we need to find ways to engage forms of live >>> connectivity that are as easy as sending an email. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Randall >>> >>> From: <netbehaviour-boun...@netbehaviour.org> on behalf of Annie Abrahams >>> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >>> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:55 AM >>> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] An interview with Geert Lovink >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I have been to a shop to buy some coffee beans and while riding my bike, I >>> thought : wasn't I a bit nasty to furtherfield/netbehaviour? When back I >>> found some reactions that reassured me, but >>> >>> I had been thinking that somehow I was a bit sour on >>> furtherfield/netbehaviour and I asked myself why, what would you like to be >>> different, to change? >>> >>> A small idea popped up : I miss the connexion between furtherfield live in >>> the park (where I imagine a lot of the work is happening) and furtherfield >>> online - especially netbehaviour. Of course there are the announcements, >>> info on the works showed of people I know online, but I miss thoughts by >>> these actual artists who showed, worked with the real place on what is going >>> on, on how the relation is constructed, of what their work does when place >>> in a gallery place. I miss personal stories on this on netbehaviour. >>> >>> >>> xxx >>> >>> Annie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Pall Thayer <pallt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Fascinating read. On gallery and museum embrace of post-internet art, I >>>> think there are two things going on. First of all, it's new and it's >>>> acceptance in galleries and museums is probably not much greater than >>>> internet art's acceptance was when it was new. Second of all, most of it >>>> takes forms which galleries and museums are familiar with, i.e. physical >>>> objects, prints, videos, etc. This is a far more attractive fit for >>>> commercial art galleries and doesn't pose any significant archiving issues >>>> for museums. At least, not ones that they haven't encountered before. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Pall >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:26 AM marc garrett <marc.garre...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Paul, Dave, Annie & all, >>>>> >>>>> Regarding Geert's interview -- I actually agree with most of what he >>>>> says. In fact, I tend to agree with most of his ideas and writings. >>>>> >>>>> I think as a group, we're in tune (usually coincidentally with his >>>>> reflections) but, living through them within a grounded context, which is >>>>> of our everyday life experience and as part of surviving as an artist led >>>>> group in a neoliberalist dominated culture. >>>>> >>>>> The audience he's talking to is an e-flux audience, and I think e-flux >>>>> are part of an neoliberalist, elite establishment, so it's positive he is >>>>> discussing these issues to its audience. >>>>> >>>>> Although, Paul has mentioned already things have been getting better and >>>>> there is evidence of things gettign better. I would say that's true in >>>>> some ways, but it may also be true that some of us have got older and into >>>>> power and so able to support media art and net art more these days. And >>>>> before this was not the case ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Wishing you well. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> marc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 14:07, Paul Hertz <igno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, happy to post polemics, it's a kind of a hobby. :^}. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think there has been a tendency for mainstream curators to approach >>>>>> more recent digitally-mediated works as if they were in effect a sort of >>>>>> hybrid old media, while still neglecting both historical and current >>>>>> "pure" digital media. This has meant that certain kinds of digital hard >>>>>> copy (modded photographic prints, collage and drawings, and even 3D >>>>>> printing == "post-digital") can be welcomed while the internet as a >>>>>> platform is generally ignored. I don't have any more evidence for this >>>>>> than observation, and I have felt that the situation for digital art was >>>>>> improving over the last ten years. OTOH, I can readily understand the >>>>>> impatience. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Paul >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:56 AM, dave miller <dave.miller...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think Geert is probably correct though - seems to me the art >>>>>>> "establishment" aren't interested in internet/ digital art, though maybe >>>>>>> they have a different view of it from us on here. The art world remains >>>>>>> a mystery to me, so I may well be wrong. Thank god for Furtherfield, and >>>>>>> I would love to know who are the curators 'not' scared of it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the post-digital¹ bandwagon? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 13:48, Annie Abrahams <bram....@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> don't be small, don't think sectarism >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Geert is closer to "us" than most "others" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> get in contact with him, explain and connect, use his critical energy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> invite him to curate, to build, to discuss >>>>>>> >>>>>>> xxx >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Annie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:40 PM, NIKOS V <nikos...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see the relevance in this approach, allthough I have to say its >>>>>>> allready to late for that criticism no? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moreover, is he really interested in art? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If yes, as Marc says, where are the references and the names ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And why is Venice Biennial important?To whom???? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-09-30 15:36 GMT+03:00 marc.garrett >>>>>>> <marc.garr...@furtherfield.org>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Paul, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Geert needs to be more specific and highlight the curators who are >>>>>>> 'not' scared and who have been showing technical artwork such as >>>>>>> Furtherifeld & others - his words are not grounded and are too absolute, >>>>>>> they do not reflect reality... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> marc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://conversations.e-flux.com/t/geert-lovink-on-social-media-and-the-a >>>>>>> rts/2581 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "The absence at the 2015 Venice Bienale of digital arts and internet >>>>>>> works says it all. Curators are afraid to admit they are clueless and >>>>>>> continue their ignorant attitude towards art that deals with the digital >>>>>>> in a direct matter (while checking their smart phone). Everyone jumps on >>>>>>> the post-digital¹ bandwagon because that¹s cute and safe. [...] >>>>>>> Curators and critics are more than happy to embrace the race, gender, >>>>>>> even the anthroposcene (whatever that is), but are blind for the >>>>>>> techno-politics of the equipment and media they are using themselves so >>>>>>> intensely. The contradictions are becoming absurd. Video was the last >>>>>>> technology they had to deal with, but then it stopped." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Geert Lovink >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> // >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> enjoy, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Paul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| --- >>>>>>> http://paulhertz.net/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinf >>>>>>> o/netbehaviour >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 26 09 14h vivre entre from estranger to e-stranger, une conférence >>>>>>> performée >>>>>>> festival Magdalena, La Bulle Bleue >>>>>>> <http://www.labullebleue.fr/#%21/magdalenaproject> , 285 rue du Mas de >>>>>>> Prunet, Montpellier >>>>>>> >>>>>>> aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stran >>>>>>> ger/ >>>>>>> <https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-t >>>>>>> o-e-stranger/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> besides, >>>>>>> online performances On Object Agency >>>>>>> with Martina Ruhsam >>>>>>> archives (text, script, video, images) >>>>>>> bram.org/besides/ <http://bram.org/besides/> >>>>>>> Marc Garrett interviewed me for the Choose Your Muse series on >>>>>>> Furtherfield >>>>>>> >>>>>>> furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-ab >>>>>>> rahams >>>>>>> <http://www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interv >>>>>>> iew-annie-abrahams> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| --- >>>>>> http://paulhertz.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> P Thayer, Artist >>>> http://pallthayer.dyndns.org >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 26 09 14h vivre entre from estranger to e-stranger, une conférence >>> performée >>> festival Magdalena, La Bulle Bleue >>> <http://www.labullebleue.fr/#%21/magdalenaproject> , 285 rue du Mas de >>> Prunet, Montpellier >>> >>> aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/ >>> <https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e- >>> stranger/> >>> >>> >>> >>> besides, >>> online performances On Object Agency >>> with Martina Ruhsam >>> archives (text, script, video, images) >>> bram.org/besides/ <http://bram.org/besides/> >>> Marc Garrett interviewed me for the Choose Your Muse series on >>> Furtherfield >>> >>> furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abraha >>> ms >>> <http://www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview- >>> annie-abrahams> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list >>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NetBehaviour mailing list >>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 26 09 14h vivre entre from estranger to e-stranger, une conférence >> performée >> festival Magdalena, La Bulle Bleue >> <http://www.labullebleue.fr/#%21/magdalenaproject> , 285 rue du Mas de >> Prunet, Montpellier >> aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/ >> <https://aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-s >> tranger/> >> >> >> >> besides, >> online performances On Object Agency >> with Martina Ruhsam >> archives (text, script, video, images) >> bram.org/besides/ <http://bram.org/besides/> >> Marc Garrett interviewed me for the Choose Your Muse series on Furtherfield >> >> furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abraham >> s >> <http://www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-a >> nnie-abrahams> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/net >> behaviour >> > > > > -- > Co-founder Co-director > Furtherfield > > www.furtherfield.org <http://www.furtherfield.org> > > +44 (0) 77370 02879 > Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce > Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i > > Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows, labs, & debates > around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997 > > Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee > registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205. > Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand Arcade, Tally > Ho Corner, London N12 0EH. > > > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netb > ehaviour > -- Co-founder Co-director Furtherfield www.furtherfield.org <http://www.furtherfield.org> +44 (0) 77370 02879 Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows, labs, & debates around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997 Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205. Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand Arcade, Tally Ho Corner, London N12 0EH. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour