Thanks Alan I very much appreciated, I am very keen on looking at people's habits and growing creative and intellectual needs as all the work I create is based on co-creations.. Happy wednesday everyone On 7 Oct 2015, at 00:57, Alan Sondheim wrote:
> > > I think one reason Fb and G+ don't work for in-depth discussions might have > to do with distractions - ads, images, announcements, etc.; they're > fundamentally lateral, and if one has more than a few friends, there are > always notifications coming through. In other words, they're porous. This is > truer for Fb (with its arcane privacy settings, etc.); G+ is quieter but more > awkward to use. I think, maybe wrongly, that Fb and G+ are more push > technologies - one has to weed through these, while email is pull; in > addition, email buffering works well, and it's easy to save posts from a > particular list - I keep all the empyre material on anguish and video, for > example, in a separate readable foldable. Blogs work really well for > discussion, but one approaches them differently; at least for me, their > structure structures discussion. Blogs have less distraction; Fb and G+ > considerably more. Of course for light chatter, there's nothing like Fb - but > I find, for example, that Marc's postings some times get lost for me. Then there's back-channeling, private posts surrounding the email list or Fb etc. discussion - epistemologically, messaging in Fb and G+ are inherently different than the newsfeed, while elists and private emails share the same phenomenology. > > Blurry and tired at my end, hope this helps? - Alan > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Joumana Mourad wrote: > >> Thank you for this communication as usual it is very inspiring....I have few >> questions.. >> Can anyone share why FB, G+, or any of the discussion platforms did not >> work? >> It is great to receive e-mails how do you honor them when time is of an >> issue? >> If someone found a discussion platform that worked for them do you mind >> sharing? >> Thanks again >> > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
