On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:38:06 -0700 "Greg A. Woods" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The whole range of other more direct problems with SVN is of course > the real issue with it: > > - not really doing branches properly or usefully What is your definition of a "useful" branch? > - not doing or tracking merges properly OK some problems exist > - not really tracking changes per project (but rather per dir) > - not being ACID in commit semantics > - not being distributed and usable offline No big deal if you don't need distributed VCS > - not having secure guarantees of commit contents Meaning? Can you give some examples? > - being slow and a big resource pig (with a larger attack surface) OK Git is somewhat more efficient, but I wouldn't describe Subversion as extremely slow.
