jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> Sure. But the changes are said to "fix" it, without success (of course,
>> they can't succeed without doing what I outlined, that's just
>> theoretically impossible, and OTOH not needed at all).
>
> And i fail to see how.

I think I can only agree with you on that.

> Factor that with these netlink messages could infact be lost

Being lost is one thing, delays are unavoidable.

> and then 
> tell me how this is any different from what you seem to be insisting 
> is a race.

You must be thinking about someone else.

> [your rant about your super-patch ignored from now on]

Better late than never.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to