James Carlson writes: > Alexey Dobriyan writes: > > - if (ap == 0) > > + if (!ap) > > And the solution is to treat it as a boolean instead?! I'm not sure > which is more ugly. > > Why wouldn't explicit comparison against NULL be the preferred fix?
I just think this whole "you shouldn't compare a pointer to 0" thing is completely silly, and patches like this have about the same level of usefulness as patches that change "color" to "colour" or vice versa. However, the head penguin seems to have some bee in his bonnet about 0 not being a pointer value (despite what the C standard says), so whatever. *shrug* Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
