On (03/15/16 10:30), Tom Herbert wrote:
> I still don't understand why you won't consider using netlink. sndbuf
> and rcvbuf seem like just two of many arbitrary parameters that a user
> might want to configure. 

> I would think that being able to configure
> the listener port (currently a fixed value), an address to bind to

the listener port is properly registered with IANA. I dont think
we will need to change that, any more than ssh/nfs ports will need 
to change.

> (instead of always inaddr-any), or not automatically creating an RDS
> listener in every namespace are at least as important configuration
> parameters as these two.

Those parameters can be added via sysctl if needed- we have not
seen the need for that yet.

And if something comes up that needs the netlink etc. we can
add it down the road. It's just not needed now.

Thanks
--Sowmini
> 
> Tom
> 
> >  net/rds/tcp.c |  139 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/rds/tcp.c b/net/rds/tcp.c
> > index ad60299..5d62fd2 100644
> > --- a/net/rds/tcp.c
> > +++ b/net/rds/tcp.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,27 @@ static LIST_HEAD(rds_tcp_conn_list);
> >
> >  static struct kmem_cache *rds_tcp_conn_slab;
> >
> > -#define RDS_TCP_DEFAULT_BUFSIZE (128 * 1024)
> > +static int sndbuf_handler(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> > +                         void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *fpos);
> > +static int rcvbuf_handler(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> > +                         void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *fpos);
> > +static struct ctl_table rds_tcp_sysctl_table[] = {
> > +       {
> > +               .procname       = "rds_tcp_sndbuf",
> > +               /* data is per-net pointer */
> > +               .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
> > +               .mode           = 0644,
> > +               .proc_handler   = sndbuf_handler,
> > +       },
> > +       {
> > +               .procname       = "rds_tcp_rcvbuf",
> > +               /* data is per-net pointer */
> > +               .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
> > +               .mode           = 0644,
> > +               .proc_handler   = rcvbuf_handler,
> > +       },
> > +       { }
> > +};
> >
> >  /* doing it this way avoids calling tcp_sk() */
> >  void rds_tcp_nonagle(struct socket *sock)
> > @@ -66,15 +86,6 @@ void rds_tcp_nonagle(struct socket *sock)
> >         set_fs(oldfs);
> >  }
> >
> > -/* All module specific customizations to the RDS-TCP socket should be done 
> > in
> > - * rds_tcp_tune() and applied after socket creation. In general these
> > - * customizations should be tunable via module_param()
> > - */
> > -void rds_tcp_tune(struct socket *sock)
> > -{
> > -       rds_tcp_nonagle(sock);
> > -}
> > -
> >  u32 rds_tcp_snd_nxt(struct rds_tcp_connection *tc)
> >  {
> >         return tcp_sk(tc->t_sock->sk)->snd_nxt;
> > @@ -272,8 +283,33 @@ static int rds_tcp_netid;
> >  struct rds_tcp_net {
> >         struct socket *rds_tcp_listen_sock;
> >         struct work_struct rds_tcp_accept_w;
> > +       struct ctl_table_header *rds_tcp_sysctl;
> > +       int sndbuf_size;
> > +       int rcvbuf_size;
> >  };
> >
> > +/* All module specific customizations to the RDS-TCP socket should be done 
> > in
> > + * rds_tcp_tune() and applied after socket creation.
> > + */
> > +void rds_tcp_tune(struct socket *sock)
> > +{
> > +       struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> > +       struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> > +       struct rds_tcp_net *rtn = net_generic(net, rds_tcp_netid);
> > +
> > +       rds_tcp_nonagle(sock);
> > +       lock_sock(sk);
> > +       if (rtn->sndbuf_size > 0) {
> > +               sk->sk_sndbuf = rtn->sndbuf_size;
> > +               sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
> > +       }
> > +       if (rtn->rcvbuf_size > 0) {
> > +               sk->sk_rcvbuf = rtn->rcvbuf_size;
> > +               sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
> > +       }
> > +       release_sock(sk);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void rds_tcp_accept_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> >  {
> >         struct rds_tcp_net *rtn = container_of(work,
> > @@ -296,6 +332,13 @@ static __net_init int rds_tcp_init_net(struct net *net)
> >  {
> >         struct rds_tcp_net *rtn = net_generic(net, rds_tcp_netid);
> >
> > +       /* 0 value for {snd, rcv}buf_size implies we let the stack
> > +        * pick the default, and permit auto-tuning of buffer size.
> > +        */
> > +       rtn->sndbuf_size = 0;
> > +       rtn->rcvbuf_size = 0;
> > +       rtn->rds_tcp_sysctl = register_net_sysctl(net, "net/rds/tcp",
> > +                                                 rds_tcp_sysctl_table);
> >         rtn->rds_tcp_listen_sock = rds_tcp_listen_init(net);
> >         if (!rtn->rds_tcp_listen_sock) {
> >                 pr_warn("could not set up listen sock\n");
> > @@ -309,6 +352,7 @@ static void __net_exit rds_tcp_exit_net(struct net *net)
> >  {
> >         struct rds_tcp_net *rtn = net_generic(net, rds_tcp_netid);
> >
> > +       unregister_net_sysctl_table(rtn->rds_tcp_sysctl);
> >         /* If rds_tcp_exit_net() is called as a result of netns deletion,
> >          * the rds_tcp_kill_sock() device notifier would already have 
> > cleaned
> >          * up the listen socket, thus there is no work to do in this 
> > function.
> > @@ -383,6 +427,81 @@ static struct notifier_block rds_tcp_dev_notifier = {
> >         .priority = -10, /* must be called after other network notifiers */
> >  };
> >
> > +static int user_atoi(char __user *ubuf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > +       char buf[16];
> > +       unsigned long ret;
> > +       int err;
> > +
> > +       if (len > 15)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, len))
> > +               return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +       buf[len] = 0;
> > +       err =  kstrtoul(buf, 0, &ret);
> > +       if (err != 0)
> > +               return -ERANGE;
> > +       return  ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* when sysctl is used to modify some kernel socket parameters,this
> > + * function  resets the RDS connections in that netns  so that we can
> > + * restart with new parameters.  The assumption is that such reset
> > + * events are few and far-between.
> > + */
> > +static void rds_tcp_sysctl_reset(struct net *net)
> > +{
> > +       struct rds_tcp_connection *tc, *_tc;
> > +
> > +       spin_lock_irq(&rds_tcp_conn_lock);
> > +       list_for_each_entry_safe(tc, _tc, &rds_tcp_conn_list, t_tcp_node) {
> > +               struct net *c_net = read_pnet(&tc->conn->c_net);
> > +
> > +               if (net != c_net || !tc->t_sock)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               rds_conn_drop(tc->conn); /* reconnect with new parameters */
> > +       }
> > +       spin_unlock_irq(&rds_tcp_conn_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sndbuf_handler(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> > +                         void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *fpos)
> > +{
> > +       struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> > +       struct rds_tcp_net *rtn = net_generic(net, rds_tcp_netid);
> > +       struct ctl_table tmp;
> > +
> > +       tmp = *ctl;
> > +       tmp.data = &rtn->sndbuf_size;
> > +       if (!write)
> > +               return proc_dointvec(&tmp, write, buffer, lenp, fpos);
> > +
> > +       rtn->sndbuf_size = user_atoi(buffer, *lenp);
> > +       rds_tcp_sysctl_reset(net);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rcvbuf_handler(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> > +                         void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *fpos)
> > +{
> > +       struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> > +       struct rds_tcp_net *rtn = net_generic(net, rds_tcp_netid);
> > +       struct ctl_table tmp;
> > +
> > +       tmp = *ctl;
> > +       tmp.data = &rtn->rcvbuf_size;
> > +       if (!write)
> > +               return proc_dointvec(&tmp, write, buffer, lenp, fpos);
> > +
> > +       rtn->rcvbuf_size = user_atoi(buffer, *lenp);
> > +       rds_tcp_sysctl_reset(net);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void rds_tcp_exit(void)
> >  {
> >         rds_info_deregister_func(RDS_INFO_TCP_SOCKETS, rds_tcp_tc_info);
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> >

Reply via email to