Sven Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:36:18AM +0200, Nuri Jawad told us: > > Did you create a high load on the system in the manner I described? > > The bug once only appeared after about 6 hours here when line + CPU had > > been mostly idle. But that was the longest time between failures. Can you > > test with one of the 2.6.16 kernels I tried (latest was .9)? Can't say > > Unfortunately it seems like plain 2.6.16.x doesn't like the ide > controller on my (VIA) mainboard, I'm getting I/O errrors on hda > when booting this kernel (but hard drive works ok with -mm) :-( > actually I haven't been running a plain stable kernel for a while, > I've been running -mm kernels for ages... >
So there's something in -mm which fixes your kernel? It's usually the other way around ;) And it sounds like something which has been in -mm for a long time, so it might not be a patch which I was planning on sending upstream. Can you think of a way in which we can identify which patch does the good deed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
