On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 21:54 +0000, Seymour, Shane M wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.duma...@gmail.com] > > Trying to cope with ridiculous windows these days is really a waste of > > time, as we perform this check for all tcp sendmsg() calls :( > > I don't disagree with you but unfortunately there are still devices > out there like this and probably will be for a long time. > > > Anyway, your patch is reversed. > > I'm not sure what you mean by reversed, I didn't change the direction > of the test in the code just what it's being compared against and so > it's greater than not greater than or equal to. > > Unless auto-correction changed reviewed to reversed?
Your diff is reversed. You sent : --- b/include/net/tcp.h 2016-06-23 20:59:14.521686048 -0500 +++ a/include/net/tcp.h 2016-06-15 17:19:21.964821477 -0500 @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static inline int tcp_bound_to_half_wnd( * On the other hand, for extremely large MSS devices, handling * smaller than MSS windows in this way does make sense. */ - if (tp->max_window > TCP_MSS_DEFAULT) + if (tp->max_window >= 512) cutoff = (tp->max_window >> 1); else cutoff = tp->max_window; You meant instead : diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h index 0bcc70f4e1fb..8dafd2c31b1d 100644 --- a/include/net/tcp.h +++ b/include/net/tcp.h @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static inline int tcp_bound_to_half_wnd(struct tcp_sock *tp, int pktsize) * On the other hand, for extremely large MSS devices, handling * smaller than MSS windows in this way does make sense. */ - if (tp->max_window >= 512) + if (tp->max_window > TCP_MSS_DEFAULT) cutoff = (tp->max_window >> 1); else cutoff = tp->max_window;