On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 22:59 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Alexei Starovoitov > <alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > imo the deliberate small race in Eric's initial lock removal in mirred > > was a good design choice. I think he did this patch only to > > silence the complains with the code instead of arguing with words. > > imo the initial code is good as-is. This patch is also a nice improvement, > > but certainly not mandatory. 'face palm' is unnecessary. > > LOL, to summarize your words: > > 1) not changing the current code is good > 2) changing the current code is good too
Only because I was tired of your rants. I wont backport this patch to Google prod kernels, I already spent too much time.
