On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > And another quick grep shows that out of 142 drivers, only one [1] of > them (incorrectly) checks netif_receive_skb() return value. >
act_mirred is not a driver, apparently. > Real question is more like : what is the impact of propagating an error > at this point ? _If_ we are going to just propagate the error like egress, then the difference is m->tcf_action (PIPE or STOLEN) vs TC_ACT_SHOT. And this error code is propagated from tcf_action_exec() up to qdisc layer...
